🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide later this week on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."