🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the upkeep of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive creatures – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I understand connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.

During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park attributes to expected lifespan, but which activists say points to the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far better medical attention and constant care than any person in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park suspected information of the death were disclosed to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be taken immediately from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the ocean, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a more general incorrect perception of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a long term resolution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable solution in the short term.

The project lead, head of the plan, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|