🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.